Showing posts with label Theological Interpretation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theological Interpretation. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 August 2018

Themelios 43, 2 (August 2018)


The latest Themelios is online here (and available here as a single pdf), containing the below articles.

Editorial
D.A. Carson
When Revival Comes

Strange Times
Daniel Strange
The Rolling Stones Will Stop

Thomas R. Schreiner
Paul and Gender: A Review Article
Cynthia Westfall has written a wide-ranging book on Paul and gender, examining key texts in their literary, cultural, and theological context. Her discussion is fresh and stimulating, and many of her insights are to be warmly welcomed. She recognizes that Paul’s view of gender must be distinguished from common conceptions in the Greco-Roman world. Nevertheless, the perspective advocated as a whole fails to convince, especially in the exegesis of key texts like 1 Corinthians 11:2–16 and 1 Timothy 2:8–15.

Robert S. Smith
Songs of the Seer: The Purpose of Revelation’s Hymns
What are the purposes of the songs of the Apocalypse? What effect are they intended to produce? After a brief discussion of the question of sources, the function played by Revelation’s hymns is explored with particular attention being paid to their connection to the cosmic conflict theme, the way they model celebration in the face of tribulation, the comfort they offer believers and the warning they present to unbelievers. The article then turns to some of the key theological emphases the songs – in particular Christological and salvific themes. While Revelation’s hymns are transparently doxological, they are also richly pedagogical and pointedly pastoral. For this reason, they pose a much-needed challenge to many contemporary praise practices.

Jackson Wu
Have Theologians No Sense of Shame? How the Bible Reconciles Objective and Subjective Shame
Everyone agrees shame is a pervasive problem; yet, in book and articles, we find writers often talk past one another. Missionaries and anthropologists speak of “honor-shame” cultures. Psychologists describe shame as an individual, emotional experience. Strangely, theologians typically say little about the topic. Christian scholars tend to treat guilt as “objective” and shame merely a “subjective.” This misunderstanding undermines our ability to develop a practical theology of honor and shame. Therefore, this article demonstrates how the Bible helps us have an integrated understanding of shame in its theological, psychological, and social dimensions.

Michael McClymond
Apocalypse Now: The Neo-Bultmannian Universalism of David Congdon’s The God Who Saves
In The God Who Saves (2016), David Congdon seeks an elusive synthesis of Karl Barth’s dogmatics and Rudolf Bultmann’s hermeneutics: he integrates Bultmann’s insistence on the concrete historicity of individual human experience with Barth’s stress on the universal salvific significance of Christ. Despite his “demetaphysicizing” rejection of a substantive God and a Chalcedonian Christ, Congdon propounds universal salvation based on a universal “cocrucifixion” with Christ that may occur in nonreligious experience (e.g., in viewing artwork, watching a baby’s birth, etc.). His intricate argument shows little theological coherence and a lack of grounding in scriptural exegesis or empirical observation.

James D. Clark
The Kuyperian Impulse of the Benedict Option
Evangelicals have criticized Rod Dreher’s Benedict Option and the idea of strategic withdrawal, with some citing Abraham Kuyper as a model of how Christians should engage the world today. This article argues that the Benedict Option and the Kuyperian tradition harmonize with (rather than contradict) each other in significant ways, including their promotion of cultural engagement in general, their recognition of the need to withdraw from the world in some sense in order to enable the Christian formation that makes robust engagement with the world possible, and their openness to a cultural transformation that is distantly future rather than imminent.

Adriani Milli Rodrigues
The Rule of Faith and Biblical Interpretation in Evangelical Theological Interpretation of Scripture
One of the features of the Theological Interpretation of Scripture movement is the use of the rule of faith in biblical interpretation. However, a comparison of evangelical scholars in this movement shows that there are significant disagreements on the concept of the rule and its hermeneutical role. The present study attempts to clarify these disagreements and briefly analyze them. This article suggests that an engagement with Cullman’s notion of apostolic and post-apostolic traditions and with aspects of Irenaeus’s concept of rule of faith might be helpful for the understanding of the concept and role of the rule of faith.

Book Reviews

Friday, 5 June 2015

Journal of Theological Interpretation 9, 1 (2015)


Journal of Theological Interpretation is one of the journals I pay hard cash for hard copy, as opposed to raiding online. The current issue, which has just landed on the door mat, contains the following essays:

Stephen I. Wright
Theological Interpretation and the Christian Year: Time, Narrative, and Performance

Jason A. Fout
What Do I Fear When I Fear My God? A Theological Reexamination of a Biblical Theme

R.W.L. Moberly
Bible and Church, Bultmann and Augustine: A Response to David Congdon

Nicholas P. Lunn
Prophetic Representations of the Divine Presence: The Theological Interpretation of the Elijah-Elisha Cycles

Joshua E. Leim
Worshiping the Father, Worshiping the Son: Cultic Language and the Identity of God in the Gospel of Matthew

William Glass
The Treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge: The Role of Esthetics in Ancient and Modern Interpretations of Paul

Rebekah Eklund
“To Us, the Word”: The Double-λόγος of Hebrews 4:12–13

Wil Rogan
Toward a Christian New Testament Theology: A Response to Thomas Hatina

Darian R. Lockett
Not Whether, but What Kind of Canonical Approach: A Review Essay

Peter H. Davids
What Reading Is Truly Canonical? A Brief Response

Robert W. Wall and David R. Nienhuis
On Reading Canonical Collections: A Response

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Vern S. Poythress on Biblical Interpretation


Westminster Theological Seminary has gathered together five articles published by Vern S. Poythress between 1986 and 2014, and made them available (here) as a single pdf, under the title Issues in Hermeneutical Foundations: Selected Articles on Hermeneutics and Biblical interpretation.

As Poythress notes in the Introduction, the articles ‘address the nature of interpretation from a God-centered point of view’, from the assumption that he is present and is significant to how we read texts: ‘what kind of differences does our knowledge of God generate in our understanding of interpretation?’

Monday, 28 October 2013

Journal of Theological Interpretation 7, 2 (Fall 2013)


The latest issue of the Journal of Theological Interpretation recently came through the post, containing the following articles:

Stephen Fowl
Effective History and the Cultivation of Wise Interpreters

R.R. Reno
Using the Fathers

John Riches
Reception History as a Challenge to Biblical Theology

John L. Thompson
At the Margins of the Rule of Faith: Reflections on the Reception History of Problematic Texts and Themes

Andrew E. Nelson
“Who Is This?” Narration of the Divine Identity of Jesus in Matthew 21:10–17

Joshua E. Leim
In the Glory of His Father: Intertextuality and the Apocalyptic Son of Man in the Gospel of Mark

Tomas Bokedal
The Rule of Faith: Tracing Its Origins

Brad Embry
“Redemption-Acquisition”: The Marriage of Ruth as a Theological Commentary on
Yahweh and Yahweh’s People

Eugene R. Schlesinger
Fire in the Water: Baptismal Aptness and Ecology in the Petrine Epistles

J. de Waal Dryden
Immortality in Romans 2:6–11

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Journal of Theological Interpretation 6, 2 (Fall 2012)


The latest issue of the Journal of Theological Interpretation has just come through, containing the following articles.

Dean Flemming
Revelation and the Missio Dei: Toward a Missional Reading of the Apocalypse

James Buchanan Wallace
Called to the Third Heaven: 2 Corinthians 11:21–12:9 in the Eastern Orthodox Liturgical Tradition

W. Derek Suderman
The Cost of Losing Lament for the Community of Faith: On Brueggemann, Ecclesiology, and the Social Audience of Prayer

Joshua Marshall Strahan
An Ecclesially Located Exegesis Informed by Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana

David I. Starling
Meditations on a Slippery Citation: Paul's Use of Psalm 112:9 in 2 Corinthians 9:9

Susannah Ticciati
The Nondivisive Difference of Election: A Reading of Romans 9–11

David J. Downs
Prosopological Exegesis in Cyprian’s De opere et eleemosynis

W. Dennis Tucker Jr.
The Early Wirkungsgeschichte of Daniel 3: Representative Examples

Tommy Givens
Good Soil for Growth in Scriptural Ethics: A Review Essay

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Jonathan T. Pennington on Reading the Gospels Wisely


Having done some work myself on the theological significance of gospel narrative, I was very interested to see notice of the forthcoming book by Jonathan T. Pennington, Reading the Gospels Wisely: A Narrative and Theological Introduction (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012), which I am confident (based on his published research on Matthew) will be excellent.
A friend has drawn my attention to a website containing a video introducing the book along with a summary of the book’s chapters, providing plenty to whet the appetite of those interested in the gospels and the relationship between the gospels and The Gospel.

Friday, 24 February 2012

D.A. Carson on the Theological Interpretation of Scripture


D.A. Carson, ‘Theological Interpretation of Scripture: Yes, But...’, in R. Michael Allen (ed.), Theological Commentary: Evangelical Perspectives (London: T&T Clark International, 2011), 187-207.


This essay by D.A. Carson (published as the final chapter of what I consider to be a lovely showcase collection of essays by evangelical scholars) has been made available as a pdf (linked to from here). Carson is more circumscribed than others in the volume about the potential benefits of the renewed interest in so-called theological readings of Scripture, seen even in his opening sentence:


‘Theological Interpretation of Scripture (TIS) is partly disparate movement, partly a call to reformation in biblical interpretation, partly a disorganized array of methodological commitments in hermeneutics, partly a serious enterprise and partly (I suspect) a fad’ (187).


Instead of putting together a list of positive points (‘yes’) and a list of negative points (‘but’) about theological interpretation, Carson considers that the ‘yes’ and ‘but’ components are ‘closely intertwined’, and so opts for ‘a sic et non for each entry’ (188), looking in turn at six propositions:


‘Proposition One: TIS is an attempt to transcend the barren exegeses generated by historical-critical methods, and especially those readings of Scripture that are “historical” in the sense that they are frankly anti-supernatural interpretations determined by post-Enlightenment assumptions about the nature of history’ (188).


‘Proposition Two: More broadly, TIS aims to bring biblical studies and theology closer together’ (192).


‘Proposition Three: TIS accords greater credibility to pre-critical exegesis – patristic, medieval, reformational – than to contemporary exegesis, and especially to patristic readings’ (196).


‘Proposition Four: TIS aims to be God-centered as opposed to human-centered (including human-hermeneutical-rules-centered)’ (202).


‘Proposition Five: TIS commonly insists we ought to read Scripture through Trinitarian lenses’ (204).


‘Proposition Six: TIS tends to see Scripture less as a set of propositions disclosing God than as the story of God and his saving plan of redemption’ (205).

Sunday, 30 October 2011

Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, 2 (Fall 2011)


The latest issue of the Journal of Theological Interpretation contains the following mix of essays (the first three of which were originally presented at the session History, Historicisms, and Theological Interpretation at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, Theological Hermeneutics of Christian Scripture Group):


Raymond C. Van Leeuwen

The Quest for the Historical Leviathan: Truth and Method in Biblical Studies


Joel B. Green

Rethinking “History” for Theological Interpretation


Matthew Levering

Linear and Participatory History: Augustine’s City of God


Daniel Castelo and Robert W. Wall

Scripture and the Church: A Précis for an Alternative Analogy


Thomas Andrew Bennett

Paul Ricoeur and the Hypothesis of the Text in Theological Interpretation


James A. Andrews

On Original Sin and the Scandalous Nature of Existence


David H. Wenkel

Wild Beasts in the Prophecy of Isaiah: The Loss of Dominion and Its Renewal through Israel as the New Humanity


Jonathan Huddleston

What Would Elijah and Elisha Do? Internarrativity in Luke’s Story of Jesus


Charles Raith II

Abraham and the Reformation: Romans 4 and the Theological Interpretation of Aquinas and Calvin

Saturday, 8 October 2011

J. Todd Billings on How to Read the Bible


J. Todd Billings, ‘How to Read the Bible’, Christianity Today (7 October 2011).


J. Todd Billings has a long but helpful article in Christianity Today, making the point that ‘new strategies for interpreting Scripture turn out to be not so new – and deepen our life in Christ’.


The article essentially offers a convenient summary way in to some of what’s being said on the theological interpretation of Scripture and echoes Billings’ earlier book on this topic. He has also published a book on the notion of being ‘incorporated into Christ’ in Calvin’s theology, and I’ve enjoyed his work on both these areas. He has a wider treatment of the latter topic – union with Christ – forthcoming with Baker Books, which I suspect will be very good.


Here, he begins with treatments which effectively communicate that the Bible ‘is the authoritative answer book to felt needs and problems’, offering a message that centres on ‘the individual and his or her preferences, and does not interpret the Bible in a way that calls felt needs into question or looks beyond them’.


He draws attention to the resurgence of interest in the ‘theological interpretation of Scripture’, with its encouragement to read the Bible ‘as God’s instrument of self-revelation and saving fellowship’, noting that ‘this school of interpretation includes a wide range of practices, but all of them move us toward knowing the triune God and being formed as Christ’s disciples through Scripture’.


Instead of providing a detailed blueprint for life or a mere smorgasbord from which we pick and choose whatever is relevant for our lives, ‘a theological reading brings a map for a journey’, and ‘our reading sends us on a journey in which God in Scripture encounters us again and again, both with comforting signs of his presence and surprises that confound us, yet may open new vistas’.


He says a few things about reading from the perspective of the ‘rule of faith’, the significance of Spirit-illumination, and the role of the Christian community.


‘The indwelling of the Spirit in the Christian community, as one located “in Christ,” uniquely equips the Christian community to interpret the Bible as God’s Word.’


He concludes with some reflections on reading the Old Testament from the perspective of Christ, and reading with confidence and humility.


‘[We] can read the Bible confidently, knowing that God acts powerfully through Scripture – in corporate worship, through prayer and memorization, through teaching and witness. We do not have to master Scripture and then make it relevant to our lives; through Scripture, God opens up a new place for us to dwell, a place of fellowship with Christ on a path leading to love of God and neighbor.’

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, 1 (Spring 2011)


The latest issue of the Journal of Theological Interpretation has just dropped through the letter box containing, as usual, lots of interesting-looking articles... well, enough to delight the heart of this young man anyway...


Beverly Roberts Gaventa

Reading for the Subject: The Paradox of Power in Romans 14:1-15:6


Michael J. Gorman

Romans: The First Christian Treatise on Theosis


Richard B. Hays

Spirit, Church, Resurrection: The Third Article of the Creed as Hermeneutical Lens for Reading Romans


Keith A. Quan

The Inscripturated Word: The Fourth Gospel as the Continuing Speech of the Incarnate Word


C. Kavin Rowe

God, Greek Philosophy, and the Bible: A Response to Matthew Levering


Benjamin J. Ribbens

Typology of Types: Typology in Dialogue


Colin M. Toffelmire

Scripture as Semiotic System: Theological Interpretation and the Multiple Senses of Scripture


John J. O’Keefe

Review Article: The New Irenaeus


L. Daniel Hawk

Review Article: Christianizing Joshua: Making Sense of the Bible’s Book of Conquest


Raymond C. Van Leeuwen

Review Article: Toward a Biblical Account of Sin?

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

Billington’s Bookshelf 2010


[I’ve already posted a version of the below as a web article for the London Institute for Contemporary Christianity, and thought I’d post it here as well before March turns into April. It’s along the same lines as a list I did for 2008 and another one I did for 2009. Although this one is fuller, as with those entries, the idea has been to profile some books published on the Bible during 2010 (or, in one case below, a book that came to my attention in 2010). The usual caveats apply... I’ve limited myself to books on the Bible (Bible overviews, hermeneutics, biblical theology, commentaries, etc.). I’m not suggesting these were the best books of 2010; the list is limited by my own limitations and is also somewhat driven by work-related commitments, among other things. As with previous years, the mention of an item here does not preclude either earlier or subsequent mention elsewhere on the blog. So, with all those qualifications in place...]


2010 added to the already-considerable pile of books from recent years expounding and exploring the storyline of the Bible. Among them was D.A. Carson, The God Who is There: Finding Your Place in God’s Story (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2010), which guides readers through the big story of the Bible with a special focus on the God who all the time takes the initiative in his relationship with men and women. A separate leader’s guide for groups is also available, containing discussion questions and broader theological and pastoral reflections.


In Remaking a Broken World: The Heart of the Bible Story (Bletchley: Authentic, 2010), Christopher Ash offers a stimulating Bible overview based around the theme of the ‘gathering’ and ‘scattering’ of God’s people in the biblical storyline, emphasising that ‘the local church is at the heart of the Bible story, that it is close to the heart of the purposes of God, and that it is how a broken world will be remade’. His book nicely complements others in this genre which, for the most part, take a more ‘kingdom’-oriented approach to the biblical story. It also signals a helpful move from merely outlining the storyline of Scripture (crucial though that is in a time of increasing biblical illiteracy) to reflecting on its implications for Christians and the church today. Another one which moves in this direction is Mike Erre, Why the Bible Matters: Rediscovering Its Significance in an Age of Suspicion (Eugene: Harvest House Publishers, 2010). About half the book works its way through the biblical story while the other half explores the significance of finding our place in the story. This book would now be one of my top recommendations in accessible treatments of the Bible’s big story.


How the ‘biblical story’ approach might be worked out in the interpretation of a particular biblical book is seen in Timothy G. Gombis, The Drama of Ephesians: Participating in the Triumph of God (Downers Grove: IVP, 2010). It’s not a commentary so much as what the author calls ‘a cultural and theological engagement with the text of Ephesians’. Ephesians, he says, is not a ‘collection of facts or theological truths that need to be extracted’ but ‘a drama in which Paul portrays the powerful, reality-altering cosmos-transforming acts of God in Christ to redeem God’s world and save God’s people for the glory of his name’. Through the death and resurrection of Christ, God has defeated the powers of darkness, and the church is called to reenact this drama as we are transformed into a mature, cross-shaped people.


Two more worth mentioning before we move on are Michael R. Emlet, CrossTalk: Where Life & Scripture Meet (Greensboro: New Growth Press, 2009) and Ron Martoia, The Bible as Improv: Seeing and Living the Script in New Ways (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010). Both, in different ways, explore the significance of the Bible’s story for how we appropriate Scripture for today. Largely from the perspective of using the Bible in counselling, Emlet offers a readable and very helpful treatment, looking particularly at how God’s ‘story’ in the Bible connects with our ‘stories’. Martoia uses the increasingly pervasive ‘improvisation’ model as a way of thinking through what applies from the Bible to today and what doesn’t.


More generally on biblical interpretation, Robert Plummer, 40 Questions About Interpreting the Bible (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2010) provides a helpful resource for concise answers to questions, organised in four main sections: getting started (on text, canon, and translation), approaching the Bible generally (on interpretation and meaning), approaching specific texts (focusing particularly on the Bible’s literary types), and issues in recent discussion. 2010 also saw the publication of the second edition (though only lightly revised) of Richard Bauckham’s The Bible in Politics: How to Read the Bible Politically (London: SPCK, 2010). It remains useful in its self-conscious reflections on methodology, and in providing worked examples of ‘political exegesis’ of sample passages across Scripture.


J. Todd Billings, The Word of God for the People of God: An Entryway to the Theological Interpretation of Scripture (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010) shows that ‘theological interpretation’ is now well and truly on the landscape, seen not as a separate method so much as ‘a wide range of practices we use toward the goal of knowing God in Christ through Scripture’. Billings offers a very helpful guide to those wanting to know more about this area, and includes exegetical examples of theological interpretation at work.


In The Virtuous Reader: Old Testament Narrative and Interpretive Virtue, Studies in Theological Interpretation (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010), Richard Briggs provides a well-written treatment, with worked examples from narrative texts, of the ‘spiral’ that exists between the virtues necessary for reading Scripture and the virtues that Scripture itself inculcates in such ‘virtuous’ readers. Those who already come with some philosophy or literary theory or virtue ethics will cope better than those who don’t, but all will benefit from reflecting on how we might be shaped by Scripture into the kind of reader that is most appropriate for reading Scripture – those who read with humility, wisdom, trust, love, and receptivity.


On the biblical theology front, 2010 saw the launch of a new series from Zondervan – ‘Biblical Theology for Life’. The first volume was by Christopher J.H. Wright, The Mission of God’s People: A Biblical Theology of the Church’s Mission (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010). Following previous works which argue that the whole Bible can and ought to be read from the perspective of the mission of God – his redemptive purpose for the whole of creation – this book explores the mission of God’s people. The bulk of the book outlines the kinds of people we were created to be (caring for God’s creation, walking in God’s way, representing God to the world, etc.) and the specific tasks we are called on to do (bearing witness, proclaiming the gospel, living and working in the public square, etc.). The world, the gospel, and the church frame the book and dominate the discussion, their treatment flowing out of the overarching story of Scripture, demonstrating the significance of biblical theology in handling these themes, and showing mission as the all-encompassing purpose of God to restore creation.


In the same ‘Biblical Theology for Life’ series, Jonathan Lunde looks at discipleship – Following Jesus, the Servant King: A Biblical Theology of Covenantal Discipleship (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010) – where the main theological drivers are covenant (its grace and its demands) and christology (Jesus as the Servant King). If these first two volumes are anything to go by, this will be a series to watch out for.


Worth noting in publications on the doctrine of Scripture is John M. Frame, The Doctrine of the Word of God (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2010), a comprehensive (682 pages) and theologically conservative treatment of the doctrine of Scripture as God’s revelation and how it is communicated to men and women, forming the fourth volume in Frame’s ‘Theology of Lordship’ series. The discussion itself takes place without much interaction with wider scholarship in 300 pages or so, with the rest of the book containing a number of appendices of articles and reviews written over the years, conveniently gathered together here. In addition is D.A. Carson, Selected Writings on Scripture (Nottingham: Apollos, 2010) which also helpfully gathers together essays published elsewhere over the years, along with a number of reviews (some of them lengthy, reviewing significant books on Scripture).


It’s difficult to know what to mention in the area of commentaries, but we’ll limit ourselve to highlighting three series. First of all, the ‘Pillar New Testament Commentary’ series – billed as commentaries which ‘interact with the most important, informed contemporary debate yet avoid undue technical detail’. With the exception of D.A. Carson’s 1991 commentary on John, I was fairly disappointed with the first few volumes in this series. However, more recent volumes, in my opinion, have been excellent; the last few years alone have seen the release of commentaries by Douglas J. Moo on Colossians and Philemon (2008), David G. Peterson on Acts (2009), and G. Walter Hansen on Philippians (2009). 2010 saw the addition of Peter T. O’Brien, The Letter to the Hebrews (Nottingham: Apollos, 2010) – to join his earlier excellent entry on Ephesians – and Roy E. Ciampa and Brian S. Rosner, The First Letter to the Corinthians (Nottingham: Apollos, 2010). Now the series taken as a whole is shaping up to the best, if not the best, of commentaries written from an evangelical perspective at this level.


Secondly, hard on the heels of the ‘Two Horizons Commentary Series’ (Eerdmans) and the ‘Brazos/SCM Theological Commentary on the Bible’ (Brazos and SCM), both devoted to a more self-consciously theological reading of Scripture, comes a new series from Westminster John Knox – ‘Belief: A Theological Commentary on the Bible’ – which aims to focus ‘less on traditional historical and literary angles in favor of a theologically focused commentary that considers the contemporary relevance of the texts’. 2010 saw the publication of two volumes: William C. Placher, Mark (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2010) and and Justo L. Gonzalez, Luke (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2010). Others are on the way.


Finally in commentaries, those familiar with N.T. Wright’s ‘For Everyone’ series on the books of the New Testament may be interested to know that John Goldingay is writing a similar series – following the same general formula – on Old Testament books. Genesis came in two volumes: Genesis for Everyone Part 1: Chapters 1-16 (London: SPCK, 2010) and Genesis for Everyone Part 2: Chapters 17-50 (London: SPCK, 2010). The rest of the Pentateuch is dealt with in a further two volumes: Exodus and Leviticus for Everyone (London: SPCK, 2010) and Numbers and Deuteronomy for Everyone (London: SPCK, 2010). Again, 2011 will see the release of others. Even those who don’t see eye to eye with Goldingay on some matters of interpretation could benefit from using these books as devotional aids or in preparation for preaching and teaching.


2011 sees the 400th anniversary of the publication of the King James Bible. We should anticipate a veritable glut of books to be released as the year goes on, exploring its history, its influence on culture and politics and language. In the run up during 2010, a number of books caught my eye, including Gordon Campbell, Bible: The Story of the King James Version 1611-2011 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) and Derek Wilson, The People’s Bible: The Remarkable History of the King James Version (Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2010), both of which do a great job of telling the story surrounding the publication of the King James Bible. In addition, David Crystal, Begat: The King James Bible and the English Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) explores the influence of the language of the King James Bible (itself based on earlier translations) on language today in the continued use of phrases like ‘lamb to the slaughter’, ‘as old as the hills’, ‘written in stone’, ‘sour grapes’, showing how the Bible ‘begat’ such phrases in the English language – now found in newspaper headlines, TV sitcoms, song lyrics, and book titles.


In line with the interest that will be generated by the King James Bible anniversary comes Biblefresha movement of churches, agencies, colleges and festivals seeking to encourage and inspire churches across the UK to a greater confidence and appetite for the Word of God. The vision of Biblefresh is ‘to make 2011 a year of the Bible to help individuals and the whole church gain greater skill in handling the scriptures and a greater passion for hearing and obeying the Bible’. As part of the initiative, a manual – Biblefresh (Milton Keynes: Authentic, 2010) – was published, containing lots of helpful short articles containing ideas for individuals, small groups and churches to take practical steps in reading the Bible, being trained in handling the Bible, supporting translation work, and experiencing the Bible in new and creative ways.

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Randy L. Maddox on John Wesley on the Bible


Randy L. Maddox, ‘The Rule of Christian Faith, Practice, and Hope: John Wesley on the Bible’, Methodist Review 3 (2011), 1–35.


A relatively pain-free sign-up process allows access to articles in Methodist Review.


Here’s the abstract of an article by Randy L. Maddox from the current volume, looking at the what, how, and why of John Wesley’s reading of Scripture:


‘John Wesley insisted that a good theologian must be a good textuary (student of biblical texts). This essay surveys his model as a textuary, highlighting insights from recent secondary studies and providing some new evidence from just-released sources. The first section focuses on what Bible Wesley read, probing his assumptions about canon and his emphasis on studying Scripture in the original languages. The second section details several dimensions of how Wesley read the Bible, with particular attention to his “theological” reading of Scripture and the identification of his distinctive “working canon.” The final section turns to why Wesley read the Bible, stressing that he valued Scripture for more than just a guide to Christian faith. His strongest emphasis was on Scripture as a “means of grace” for nurturing Christian life, and his life-long practice of immersion in Scripture served to sustain and broaden his sense of the Christian hope.’

Friday, 4 February 2011

Daniel J. Treier on Theology as Wisdom


[A version of the following review was first published in August 2007 on the UK Christian Bookshops Directory website, which contains lots of other reviews, and is my first port of call for looking up the location of Christian bookshops when I visit towns and cities around the country – much to the chagrin of other members of my family... Thanks to Phil Groom for giving me the opportunity to review the book.]


Daniel J. Treier, Virtue and the Voice of God: Toward Theology as Wisdom (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006), xvi + 278pp., ISBN 9780802830746.


Those who take courses in theology sometimes find themselves wrestling with particular tensions thrown up during the programme of study, or even by the nature of the subject itself. Should theology be done by the church or by the college? How does ‘theory’ relate to ‘practice’? What is the connection between what I study over here (in biblical studies) and what I study over there (in systematic theology)? Ostensibly a work in theological education, Daniel J. Treier, associate professor of theology at Wheaton College, Illinois, seeks to address some of these questions. In particular, the book is an extended discussion of two ongoing conversations: (1) the nature of theology understood in terms of ‘wisdom’, and (2) the theological interpretation of Scripture, where again wisdom has become a key concern in thinking about the role of virtue in understanding the Bible.


The volume contains seven chapters in three parts. The first part focuses on the nature of theology as wisdom. During the period of the Enlightenment, theology was treated as a kind of ‘science’, which excluded questions of virtue on principle, which was carried out in the university rather than the church, and which introduced the sorts of chasms we still live with today, between clergy and laity, for instance, or theory and practice. But for most of Christian history, theology was an enterprise which was done in and for the church, and was viewed in terms of wisdom rather than science – the kind of knowledge which is directed towards knowing and loving God, the kind of knowledge which forms the lives of Christians and churches. Exploring what the Bible itself says about wisdom, Treier argues that theology understood in terms of ‘wisdom’ embraces not just a select few, but everyone who is addressed by God and who is enabled to seek wisdom through the help of the Spirit.


A main way God forms the church is through Scripture, which means how Christians read the Bible is extremely important. In the second part of the book, Treier shows how Scripture is an authoritative word from God which stands over the church, which is illumined by the Spirit, who leads the church to develop virtues in reading it. The third part of the book then argues that Christians are able to speak of God publicly in the face of the world, not just privately in the context of the church. Reading Scripture wisely and being formed by it in the process involves reading it in the midst of present-day challenges.


This brief summary can’t begin to do justice to the ins and outs of Treier’s discussion, to the interweaving of historical, biblical, hermeneutical, and doctrinal reflection. In fact, although ultimately rewarding, following the involved argument is difficult, very difficult at times, and requires more than a nodding acquaintance with debates in contemporary theology and hermeneutics. In this sense, the book’s origin as a PhD dissertation (conducted under the supervision of Kevin Vanhoozer) is apparent. The demanding discussion is compounded by the fact that the publishers have put notes (46 pages of them) at the end of the book rather than at the foot of each page, which means keeping a finger in the back of the book and flicking back and forth whilst trying to keep the threads of the argument in mind.


If Treier himself is unable to do so, I hope that others will be inspired to make the fruit of the research digestible to a broader audience, that the theological wisdom of which the book speaks will indeed become an ‘every member’ reality for churches who seek to listen and respond to God’s voice in Scripture.

Thursday, 23 December 2010

Journal of Theological Interpretation 4, 2 (Fall 2010)


The latest Journal of Theological Interpretation arrived in the post this morning – just in time for Christmas!


Contents are as follows:


Andrew Brower Latz

A Short Note toward a Theology of Abiding in John’s Gospel


Matthew Levering

God and Greek Philosophy in Contemporary Biblical Scholarship


Jason S. Sexton

The Imago Dei Once Again: Stanley Grenz’s Journey toward a Theological Interpretation of Genesis 1:26–27


Douglas S. Earl

‘Minimalism’ and Old Testament Theological Hermeneutics: The ‘David Saga’ as a Test Case


Timo Eskola

Quran Criticism, the Historical-Critical Method, and the Secularization of Biblical Theology


Richard P. Thompson

Scripture, Christian Canon, and Community: Rethinking Theological Interpretation Canonically


Stephen B. Chapman

The Canon Debate: What It Is and Why It Matters


Stephen T. Pardue

Athens and Jerusalem Once More: What the Turn to Virtue Means for Theological Exegesis


Richard S. Briggs

Review Article: Christian Theological Interpretation of Scripture Built on the Foundation of the Apostles and the Prophets: The Contribution of R.W.L. Moberly’s Prophecy and Discernment