Wednesday, 4 January 2017
Carl Trueman and G.K. Beale on Issues in History and Exegesis
Saturday, 12 November 2016
Fides et Humilitas 3 (2016)
Saturday, 27 August 2011
Christian History Magazine on Hell
Christian History Institute, publisher of Christian History magazine, provides a 32-page magazine on ‘The History of Hell: A Brief Survey and Resource Guide’, from Justin Martyr to thumbnail sketches of more-recent treatments, yes, including Rob Bell.
It’s available as an 8.6 MB pdf here.
Friday, 29 April 2011
Kenneth J. Stewart on Ten Myths about Calvinism
Kenneth J. Stewart, Ten Myths about Calvinism: Recovering the Breadth of the Reformed Tradition (Nottingham: Apollos, 2011), 256pp., ISBN: 9781844745135.
I just got a copy of this title. The ten myths, should you want to know, are split into two sections:
Part 1: Four Myths Calvinists Should Not Be Circulating (But Are)
1. One Man (Calvin) and One City (Geneva) Is Determinative
2. Calvin’s View of Predestination Must Be Ours
3. TULIP is the Yard Stick of the Truly Reformed
4. Calvinists Take a Dim View of Revival and Awakening
Part 2: Six Myths Non-Calvinists Should Not Be Circulating (But Are)
5. Calvinism Is Largely Anti-missionary
6. Calvinism Promotes Antinomianism
7. Calvinism Leads to Theocracy
8. Calvinism Undermines the Creative Arts
9. Calvinism Resists Gender Equality
10. Calvinism Has Fostered Racial Inequality
I suspect the heart of Stewart’s burden is captured in the subtitle – recovering the breadth of the Reformed tradition.
Friday, 22 April 2011
Gregg R. Allison on Historical Theology
Gregg R. Allison, Historical Theology: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine: A Companion to Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011), 784pp., ISBN 9780310230137.
Zondervan make available online an excerpt of this full volume on historical theology. The first chapter comprises the Introduction, and addresses three questions:
(1) What is historical theology?
(2) What benefits does it provide?
(3) How should we study it?
What is historical theology?
‘Historical theology is the study of the interpretation of Scripture and the formulation of doctrine by the church of the past’ (23).
What benefits does it provide?
• ‘One benefit that historical theology offers the church today is helping it distinguish orthodoxy from heresy’ (24).
• ‘A second benefit of historical theology is that it provides sound biblical interpretations and theological formulations’ (24).
• ‘A third benefit of historical theology is that it presents stellar examples of faith, love, courage, hope, obedience, and mercy’ (25).
• ‘A fourth benefit that historical theology renders the church is to protect against the individualism that is rampant today among Christians’ (26).
• ‘A fifth benefit of historical theology is that it not only helps the church understand the historical development of its beliefs, but enables it to express those beliefs in contemporary form’ (27).
• ‘A sixth benefit of historical theology is that it encourages the church to focus on the essentials, that is, to major on those areas that have been emphasized repeatedly throughout the history of the church’ (28).
• ‘A seventh benefit of historical theology is that it gives the church hope by providing assurance that Jesus is fulfilling his promise to his people’ (28).
• ‘Finally, as beneficiaries of the heritage of doctrinal development sovereignly overseen by Jesus Christ, the church of today is privileged to enjoy a sense of belonging to the church of the past’ (29).
How should we study it?
There are two basic approaches to studying historical theology: (1) the synchronic approach ‘engages in the study of the theology of a certain time period, a particular theologian, a specific theological school or tradition, and the like’, and (2) the diachronic approach ‘engages in the study of the development of thought on a given doctrine throughout the periods of the church’s history’ (29).
Friday, 19 June 2009
Richard C. Gamble on The Whole Counsel of God
Richard C. Gamble, ‘The Relationship Between Biblical Theology and Systematic Theology’, in Andrew T.B. McGowan (ed.), Always Reforming: Explorations in Systematic Theology (Leicester: Apollos, 2006), 211-39.
It’s slap bang in the middle of an issue, possibly the issue, that interests and excites me most – the relationship between biblical theology and systematic theology.
In it, Gamble refers several times to his forthcoming multi-volume work – The Whole Counsel of God – and my appetite was whetted for a full-scale treatment of the theme.
That was 2006.
At last, in June 2009, the first volume of a projected trilogy is now out:
Richard C. Gamble, The Whole Counsel of God, Volume 1: God’s Mighty Acts in the Old Testament (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 2009), 864pp., ISBN 9780875521916.
Some sample pages are available here.
Gamble devotes a few introductory pages to outlining what he sees as the ‘exegetical foundation’ and ‘historical background’ to the whole project.
The ‘exegetical foundation’ is found in the scene from Acts 20:25-28, where Paul says to the Ephesian elders that he has not hesitated ‘to proclaim to you the whole counsel [or will] of God’ (20:27). Gamble holds that the elders are to do as Paul had done, and that the same task continues today.
Under ‘historical background’, he situates himself squarely in the Reformed tradition, particularly Calvin and developments of Reformed theology, notably John Owen’s Biblical Theology (1661), Herman Witsius’ The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man (1685), and (more recently) Geerhardus Vos’ Biblical Theology (1948).
The first volume in the trilogy focuses on God’s self-revelation in the Old Testament, the second volume will deal with the New Testament, and the third promises to trace the theological development in the church’s understanding of Scripture through the centuries.
Gamble summarises:
‘The Whole Counsel of God is written to continue discussions of the relationship between exegesis and hermeneutics, and the interrelationships of biblical, systematic, and historical theology. The Whole Counsel of God will attempt to meet the need for a comprehensive theology that is attuned to the methodological advantages of biblical theology, but will also combine that advantage with the strengths of historical and systematic theology’ (xxxiii).
I look forward to seeing how the project plays out.